UCI banned road bike position aerodynamics

18 April 2021
The UCI have changed their regulations on road bike positions, outlawing some positions for safety reasons.

In this test we explored a range of positions that you can hold on the road bike, to see how they all compared for aerodynamic drag. A lower aerodynamic drag will result in less power required to travel at the same speed, or for the same power will cause an increase in riding speed, when not travelling up steep gradients.

The goal of this test was to evaluate how changing  position on a road bike from legal to UCI illegal positions affected aerodynamic drag.

We tested 6 positions in total that might be used in racing when travelling at relatively high speeds (on the flat, not whilst climbing). 


RELAXED ARMS HOODS (baseline)

The baseline and reference position was holding the hoods, with slightly bent elbows. This is a typical comfortable position that can be held for long distances.


DROPS

Holding the drops helps reduce torso angle, which is often more aerodynamic on a road bike, and is useful to lower the centre of gravity when cornering or descending.


AERO HOODS

This is similar to the hoods position but with forearms parallel to the ground. Popular for breakaway riding it helps to lower your torso angle and also present less forearm to the wind compared with the drops position.


FOREARM RIDING (banned)

This simulates an aerobars position by resting the forearms on the tops of the bars, with hands draped over the centre of the bars in mid air. Resulting in less control, it was a popular position for breakaway riders or those at the front of the peloton. This has been explicitly banned by the UCI since April 2021.


LEVER HOOKS (banned)

In order to move the elbows further forward and reduce torso angle, some riders have tried wrapping their hands around the front of the brake levers. This position has caused some DSQs in UCI events since the rule changes in April 2021 so appears also not to be permitted.


AERO HOODS BENT INWARDS

A final position is holding forearms parallel like the aero hoods position, but with the shift levers bent inwards to narrow the hands. There is a risk of elbows flaring out with this position because of the new lever angle, especially when relaxing the arms.

In order to test aerodynamic drag we went to an outdoor velodrome, and our test rider Richard performed a series of repeats of each position using a power meter, whilst we also measured environmental variables such as wind and air density.


Richard was wearing a jersey with bibs, aero socks, an aero road helmet and was on a Giant Propel bike. 


The data was then processed as in our commercial outdoor aero sessions, using custom scripts to establish a CdA (aerodynamic drag) for each position.


CdA is the combination of both frontal area (the A part of the equation) and drag coefficient (Cd), and is reported in m².

The CdAs for each of the positions tested can be seen below.


The banned positions are similar to an aero hoods position, with a slight advantage to the forearm position. Holding the aero hoods position can be quite fatiguing on the upper arms, so making it worthwhile is very dependent on ensuring you can hold it for extended periods. If you fatigue and start to straighten your arms it is then a lot slower.


The bent inwards lever position is faster than not bending the levers in, but with the caveat that it can cause your elbows to flare out when you sit up, which is slower.

Compared with some of the UCI banned positions, an aero hoods position is nearly as fast and much safer. It is much faster to hold an aero hoods position than drops or relaxed hoods, but can be fatiguing and often requires practice.


Bending the levers inwards results in a small improvement. Using narrower handlebars rather than bending the levers inwards will help reduce the risk of your elbows flaring outwards, which will be slower when holding a relaxed hoods position.


The 35w boost by moving to an aero hoods position from a relaxed hoods position at 45kph will increase speed in this example by 1.65kph for the same power output, which is worth  nearly 2min over 40km.


  • Relaxed hoods

    Write your caption here
    Button
  • Drops

    Write your caption here
    Button
  • Aero hoods

    Write your caption here
    Button
  • Forearm position

    Write your caption here
    Button
  • Lever hooks

    Write your caption here
    Button
by PH587141 4 August 2025
It has often been said that to have good cycling wheel performance, there is a "rule" that the external rim width of a wheel should be at least 105% of the width of the tyre, or that there is a simple relationship/formula that will predict the aerodynamic performance of a wheel based on rim width vs tyre width. Whilst this may have rung true with older models of wheels which shared a V shaped or flat sidewall shape, modern rims come in a range of shapes which vary in terms of their aero performance due to a number of factors, not just external rim width. Rim depth, the vertical location of maximum rim width, nose profile (at the spoke entry point), dropoff angle to nose profile and "brake track" angle are all critical components that add up to allow for a fast rim shape. The data below is a subset, taken from a wind tunnel test of deeper time trial/triathlon wheels, both with normal spokes and composite multispokes (3 and 4 spokes), exploring if there is a simple relationship between the external width of a wheel and its performance, all with the identical same tyre.
by PH587141 30 July 2025
Reducing rolling resistance is imperative to improved cycling performance, particularly during high speed track cycling. A tyre with a high rolling resistance will require more power to travel at the same speed, whilst a low rolling resistance tyre requires less power. We have previous shown that top end clincher tyres, such as the FMB/AeroCoach Pista Ultra 3000 have extremely low rolling resistance. We have also found that for road tyres at road pressures, latex inner tubes are the best option for reducing Crr compared with TPU tubes. In this test we explore the difference between TPU and latex tubes but at higher, track relevant pressures and with a track specific tyre rather than a road tyre.
4 April 2025
AeroCoach has collaborated with French artisan tyre makes FMB to create the highest performance track clincher and tubular tyres. Read on for the process and data.
by PH587141 27 November 2024
The new Continental Aero 111 tyre is designed to provide maximal aerodynamic advantage by use of a custom tread pattern. However there is often a tradeoff between aerodynamics and rolling resistance (Crr) in terms of how tyres are shaped and how this affects Crr, and understanding how the two combine to provide the overall fastest system is essential when looking to improve performance on the bike.
16 February 2024
This test explores the difference in rolling resistance between clincher and tubular track racing tyres. Vittoria, Veloflex, Dugast and Continental tyres are compared at different inflation pressures.
Dr Xavier Disley of AeroCoach & Chris Hall are performing a road bike fit at AeroCoach HQ
by PH587141 23 October 2023
Chris Hall came to visit us at AeroCoach HQ in order to improve his bike fit on his Cervélo road bike, specifically focusing on aerodynamics for road bike time trials. Holding different positions such as in the drops, the breakaway aero position and on the hoods we explored the impact on Chris' body position and how that would relate to his aerodynamic drag. Watch the video to improve your road bike fit for aerodynamics: Xavier and Chris discuss narrow handlebars, turned in levers, torso angle, aero helmets and more!
22 May 2023
Ensuring you have the best equipment during high speed track cycling events is extremely important. This data set provides information on the best tubular track tires/tyres for rolling resistance/Crr.
23 November 2022
In 2023 there are new regulations for UCI time trial positions, relating to extension reach and shifter height, based on rider height. AeroCoach offer a range of options for our Ascalon extensions to achieve all possible combinations for the three rider height categories. Please see our TT position video below for an overview of the changes, and scroll down for the Ascalon options. PlePlea
6 July 2022
Aerobar extensions, whether used on a triathlon/TT bike or using a clip on system on a road bike, come in a wide variety of sizes and shapes. AeroCoach has been testing riders since 2012 and we've noticed a few trends into how you can optimally hold your extensions for aerodynamics as well as comfort. Your body accounts for around 80% of the aerodynamic drag of the bike and rider system. Your optimal stack height, extension reach and elbow width for aerodynamics will be individual and can only be determined by conducting an aero test, but as well as these variables there are differences in how riders hold their hands on extensions, and in this test we explored some general guidelines which you can follow. Don't forget, a lower aerodynamic drag will result in less power required to travel at the same speed, or for the same power will cause an increase in riding speed, when not travelling up steep gradients.
23 December 2021
In the UK, having a front light when racing time trials is now obligatory under CTT regulations. Not only this, but also some events are conducted over long periods of time (eg. 24hrs, or multi day ultra endurance rides) and so with front lights being a necessity we explored the impact of front lights on racing aeroydnamics in the wind tunnel.
Show More